Sunday, August 30, 2015
Genuine Love
Genuine
Love
Romans
12:9-13
At first this title might seem silly. What is fake love? Is there such a thing? What would it look like? Would it be hypocritical, looking like love
on the outside, but in reality being some other emotion? Would it seem to be genuine but only out for
what it could get for itself? Would it
be manipulative, conniving, greedy, instead of giving and caring? Fake love could be all these things and
more. In fact, there is probably more
fake love in this world than genuine love.
How do we know the difference?
Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians does a good job of
telling us what genuine love looks like.
After criticizing his audience for their failure to love each other
genuinely, he beautifully and succinctly shows them true love in Chapter
13. Anyone who reads this chapter carefully
can’t miss knowing how they should love.
This isn’t the only place Paul talks about genuine
love. Sooner or later he gets around to
it in most if not all his letters. His
epistle to the Romans is a good example.
Paul has written extensively about his people, the Jews. He grieves because they have rejected Jesus, who
Paul sees as the next logical step in Judaism—the Messiah for whom they have
been waiting for hundreds of years. But
he assures his readers that the Jews will be saved, that God will keep the
promise made in the wilderness of Sinai.
Paul then tells his Gentile readers not to become smug
because God has accepted them and seems to have rejected the Jews. Not only will the Jews be restored if they
accept Christ, but those Gentiles who have been “grafted in” can, if they
become egotistical or careless about their newfound status, be cut back
out. So Paul says, “I say to everyone
among you not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think,” because
conditions can change.
Then Paul gives his readers some good advice. In one translation this passage is headed,
“Marks of the True Christian,” and it begins with the words, “Let love be
genuine.” Perhaps realizing that this
statement is likely to raise questions (such as those we asked earlier) he
describes what genuine love should look like.
·
Abhor what is evil; hold fast to what is
good.
·
Love one another with brotherly [and
sisterly] affection.
·
Do not be slothful in zeal, be fervent in
spirit, serve the Lord.
·
Rejoice in hope, be patient in
tribulation, be constant in prayer.
·
Contribute to the needs of the saints and
seek to show hospitality.
There’s
another paragraph which continues the list.
I encourage you to read it. The
further Paul goes in this list the more he sounds like the Jesus Christ to whom
he gave his life. By the time he gets to
the end of the second paragraph he is essentially quoting Jesus’ words.
What
is genuine love? Paul tells us in terms
that are so clear and concise that he cannot be misunderstood. This love calls us to give, to forgive, to
spend and be spent serving those who need us—in other words, to live as Jesus
lived no matter what it costs. That’s
what real love looks like.
We
need to remember what Jesus taught us about neighbors in the parable of the
Good Samaritan. It’s easy to love those
who love us, who behave like us, who look like us, who think like us. When we offer genuine love we extend it not
just to the few who are close to us but to the least of these, to the ones we
consider not worthy of our love, the ones who are completely unlovable. This is where love becomes difficult—but this
is how we must love.
Sunday, August 23, 2015
Eating With Sinners
Eating
With Sinners
Luke
15:1-2, 7:36-50
Several years ago my wife and I were teaching in a small
town in another state. We were also the
music team at one of the local churches (I conducted the choir, and Mary, the
one with talent, played organ and piano).
We were only there a year, but during that time there was an interesting
occurrence at the church.
A man who sang in the choir told me about the end of his
first marriage. He and his wife had been
members of another church when she left him.
The church reacted negatively to him,
asking, “How could you do this to us?” He was the injured party, but instead of
rallying around him, supporting him, and offering him Christian love and care,
they condemned him for something that was not only not his fault, but that he
had been powerless to prevent.
The man left the church, remarried, and became a member
of the church we later served. This
couple began a ministry to those who were grieving because of broken
relationships. We attended one of the
sessions to see it for ourselves. The love
that poured out of this couple, the compassion for those who were hurting, and
the assurance of God’s care were overwhelmingly beautiful. Those despairing people came away from that
weekend knowing that they were loved, and that God had not deserted them. This man had turned his negative marital and church
experience into one that was positive for many grateful people.
Later that year we arrived at church one Sunday morning
to find the place in an uproar. The news
had just broken that one of the married women in the church had become involved
with another member. The affair was
brief, had ended, and although the husband had been terribly hurt, he chose to
reconcile with his wife. Over the next
months the couple worked diligently to repair their broken relationship. We left town before the healing was complete,
so we don’t know the final outcome, but they seemed to be making great progress
towards repairing the breach.
What was interesting was the reaction of the couple whose
marriages had broken down and had turned their pain into a healing
ministry. The morning when all was
revealed, they walked out of the church never to return. Another couple who had gone through divorces
left also. The church was devastated by
the loss, but managed to recover and move on.
Sad, isn’t it: these people who had helped so many others
couldn’t bend to help those close to them.
The man who had been most affected by the affair worked with his wife to
try to restore their relationship. The
other couples, themselves victims of failed marriages, couldn’t offer love and
care.
What would Jesus do?
We find the answer in the seventh chapter of Luke. Jesus not only forgave the woman who
ministered to him with her tears and ointment, but also told a parable
involving two debts, one small, one great.
The point of the story can be found in the hymn, “Grace Greater than All
Our Sins.” God’s outrageous love
forgives all, both those who sin by breaking the law, and those who sin by
keeping the law.
Of course Jesus ate with sinners! Everyone who shared a meal with him, everyone
who came to him for help, everyone who criticized him—everyone who came into any contact with him was a sinner. How could he avoid interacting with
sinners? But of course, he didn’t try
to. Jesus knew he had come to call sinners
to repentance. How could he do that if
he avoided them? Too often we forget
that we all need God’s grace—but we won’t get it if we don’t give it.
Who did Jesus come to forgive? Us. To
whom do we offer forgiveness?
Everyone.
Sunday, August 16, 2015
Revealing Typos
Revealing
Typos
Matthew
6:9-13
Do typos drive you crazy?
They do me. As a lifelong teacher
I’ve seen more than enough of them. Sometimes
they’re annoying, like using your
instead of you’re or the other way
round. Sometimes they’re glaring, like
using car’s (possessive) instead of cars (plural). Sometimes they’re downright funny. Many humorous ones appear in newspaper
headlines. When the headline writer
doesn’t think things through the result can be interesting. We’ve all seen those headlines. One of my favorites isn’t exactly a typo, but
it does create a “Huh?” moment.
In
Illinois there are two towns close together, Normal, and Oblong. A headline once appeared in the local
paper: “Oblong Man Marries Normal
Woman.” If you live in that part of
Illinois, the headline makes sense. The
rest of us respond with, “What did it say?”
A
few years ago a friend of mine introduced me to a book entitled, A Diary of Private Prayer, by John Baillie. I’ve quoted several of his prayers in this
space. Baillie wrote two prayers for
every day of the month, morning and evening.
There are also two prayers for Sunday.
You can substitute the Sunday prayers for the ones for that day, or (as
I do) read both. Baillie uses old
biblical English (Thee, Thou, Thy when addressing God, for instance), and all biblical quotes are
from the Old King James Version. While the antiquated language is sometimes
disconcerting, there’s something majestic about it as well.
Unfortunately,
the editors of Baillie’s book missed a few typos. I don’t know whether Baillie wrote
incorrectly and the editor didn’t check thoroughly, or the typesetter goofed
and no one caught it. Either way, there
are a few places that make the reader say, “What?”
Two
of the entries end with the Lord’s Prayer.
One of them has a typo. The
opening sentence reads, “Our Father, which art in heaven, Hallowed by thy name.”
The
eye reads the line, stops, goes back and reads it again. At first the typo glares out at the reader:
“ERROR! ERROR! ERROR!”
After a few times, the typo begins to make its own kind of sense.
Isn’t
it true that we are hallowed—made
holy—by God’s name? We know we have no
righteousness in and of ourselves.
Isaiah says it (“our righteousness is like filthy rags”). David and the other psalmists tell us the
same thing. Paul says it in many
ways. Jesus says we have no grounds on
which to come before God. Without God’s
righteousness we have nothing to cling to.
But
God calls us to be holy. Acknowledging
Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior is a good start, but only a start. This is how we begin our Christian walk, a path
we will follow until it’s time for us to be with God. The only way to grow closer to God is to try,
day by day, to be more like God, to be more holy—to be hallowed by God’s name.
Sometimes
typos can be humorous. Sometimes they
can be grating because of bad grammar or incorrect spelling. Sometimes we grind our teeth at the seeming
incompetence of the writer. Occasionally
the typo makes as much sense as the correct words. This is the case here. When we pray we need to say to God, “hallowed
be thy name,” to recognize the innate holiness of that name and to give God
what God is due.
But
perhaps we should also, at times, recognize our sinfulness and misquote the
prayer, saying, “hallowed by thy name,”
admitting that we are nothing without God’s righteousness, and recognizing our
need to be completely dependent on God’s grace.
Sunday, August 9, 2015
Changing the Way We Think
Changing
the Way We Think
Philippians
4:8
Behavior modification experts say it is easier to act
your way into a new way of thinking than to think your way into a new way of
acting. They’re right. Of course
they’re right! Thinking about beginning
an exercise program rarely gets us off the couch. Thinking about watching what we eat rarely keeps
us out of fast food restaurants or the snack food aisles of the grocery
stores. Thinking about giving up smoking
rarely stops us from buying the tobacco products we know we should leave alone.
On the other hand, if we start the exercise program, or
change where we eat or the kinds of food we buy, or pass up the smokes counter,
sooner or later we’ll start changing our habits. It may take a while, but we’ll get into
shape, and perhaps even enjoy working out (at least some days). We’ll find that
healthy foods really don’t taste bad, and consist of more than just nuts and
twigs and berries and leaves. We’ll stop
smoking and enjoy the taste of food again.
I think Paul understood this. Perhaps he was a behaviorist without knowing
it. The word didn’t exist during his
lifetime. How do we know he felt this
way? Read his letters. He rarely talks about thinking, but often
talks about doing. In fact, much of the Bible is about
doing. We read about the Acts of the Apostles, not their
thoughts. Even the Ten Commandments
describe actions, not modes of thinking.
Jesus taught about how we should live, not about how we should
think. His summation of the
Commandments? Love God and love
neighbor. Those of us who have ever
loved anyone know that love is an
action verb—possibly the most active verb in the English language.
So why is Paul telling us to “think on these things,” as most
translations render this verse? Is it
possible this man of action wants us to meditate, to have good thoughts running
through our minds while we sit quietly, contemplating life? Is this perhaps a less-than-accurate
translation? Does Paul have something else
in mind?
Let’s go back to the concept of acting our way into a new
way of thinking. I remember a story I
heard many years ago. A missionary to
Africa was talking to a young man who had recently become a Christian. The missionary suggested that the new convert
might want to focus on Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount as a way of learning how to
live a Christian life. The young man
went away. Some time later he returned
to tell the missionary that he had memorized the entire sermon. The missionary was amazed, and asked how he
had done it (remember, the Sermon on the Mount begins at Matthew 5:1 and ends
at 7:27—a very long passage).
“It was easy,” the young man said. “I just went out and did what it said to do a
little at a time until I had learned it by heart.”
Easy! He said it
was easy! Through his actions he had
developed a new way of thinking, but it couldn’t have been easy. If it were, more of us would do it, and I’ve
never met anyone who has—including me.
One translation, the English Standard Version, says
“practice these things.” I believe this
is more to the point. If we practice being true, honorable, just,
and lovely, there will come a time when we think that way. Certainly, we won’t be perfect in our new way
of thinking, just as we’ll skip a few days of exercise or have an extra dessert
from time to time. But our habits will
be formed. Our inclination will be to do
those things which lead to truth and justice, to demonstrate honor in our
dealings with others, to have our actions be commendable.
How do we begin?
Like the young man learning Jesus’ words—a little at a time. Try being true, or just, or honorable for a week
or two—or a month or two. See what
happens.
Sunday, August 2, 2015
The Games People Play
The
Games People Play
Matthew
23:27-28
Oh the games people play now
Every night and every day now
Never meaning what they say now
Never saying what they mean
Some of us may remember these lyrics by Joe South. There’s a bitterness to this song, and there
are good reasons for it. Some verses are
about relationships between two people.
Some deal with people so removed from reality they don’t understand the
pain they cause. Some talk about
religion games—and it’s those verses we’ll concentrate on.
Games have rules.
If one of the players establishes the rules, that person has a far
greater chance of winning than anyone else in the game. Sometimes the rules are known. Sometimes only the “lead player”—the one who
made up the rules—knows what they are.
It’s up to the other players to figure them out. By the time this happens it’s often too
late. The players who don’t know the
rules are so far behind they can’t catch up.
Sometimes the rules are so stacked in favor of the lead player that even
if they are known the other players don’t have a chance. These situations happen far too often in
relationships.
Many of us have had bosses or co-workers who are game
players. Some of us know families that
thrive on game playing. We may even have
been part of such families. Many times
multiple games are being played at the same time, with each person being the
lead player in his/her game, using his/her rules to punish the other players.
Game playing occurs anytime someone (or some ones) choose to disguise his/her real
personality or purpose in order to gain an advantage over someone (or ones)
else. Most of us have encountered enough
of this behavior to recognize it quickly.
If so, and if possible, we stop playing the game by extricating
ourselves from the situation. Oftentimes
we can’t. The lead player is in such
complete control, or we are so involved in the situation, that we can’t get
out.
This was the case in first century Judea. The religious leaders were the lead
players. Over the years (centuries,
actually) they had established the rules.
Since they were also the referees, there was no way the other players
could win. They couldn’t even break
even.
Then Jesus came.
Not only was he not a game player, he also outranked the referees. They just hadn’t figured that out yet. But many of the other players had. They were looking for a way to end the game,
and saw their escape in Jesus’ teachings.
They saw in Jesus a way to break even or possibly end the game.
In teaching after teaching and parable after parable
Jesus showed the endgame. Sometimes he
posited a world order where games wouldn’t be played at all, where people would
be straightforward and honest, matching what they said with what they believed,
and creating a level playing field. Other
times, such as in Matthew 23:27-28, Jesus condemned the lead players and called
them what they were—hypocrites.
People walking up to ya
Singing glory hallelujah
And they’re trying to sock it to ya
In the name of the Lord
“No more one-sided games,” Jesus says. “Let’s change the rules. Those on the bottom will move to the top, and
the lead players will go to the penalty box.
If you want to be part of my kingdom you have to agree to play by my rules. God
is the referee, and God says for all of us to work together on an equalized playing
field, where cooperation—not competition—is the rule.”
God
sends the same message today. Are we
listening? Or are we too busy playing?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)