Who
Is Mary Magdalene?
John
20:11-18
For the past two thousand years Mary Magdalene has been a
center of conroversy. Accused of living
a less-than-honorable lifestyle, suspected of being married to the earthly
Jesus, and perhaps eased out of a leadership position in the early church, she has
risen above all that to be recognized as a role model for Christian discipleship.
We know little about Mary from Scripture.
Luke
tells us (8:2) that she was one of the women who traveled with Jesus throughout
Galilee after he rid her of seven demons.
Matthew
(27:56) and Mark (15:40) place her with other women at the crucifixion. She also followed the funeral procession to Gethsemane
(Matthew 27:61; Mark 15:47)
All
four evangelists tell us that Mary went to the tomb the first Easter
morning. She is the only one mentioned
by all four. John (20:1-10) mentions
only Mary Magdalene.
How
could so much controversy come from so little written evidence?
Let’s
deal first with the most damning charge against her: that she was a prostitute. Pope Gregory the Great (540-604) decided that
Mary Magdalene was also Mary of Bethany (sister of Lazarus and Martha), who
figures in John’s version of the story about Jesus’ anointing. Luke’s version (7:36-50) says the woman who
anointed Jesus was a sinner.
Prostitution was the most common way for a woman to be labeled a sinner
in the first century. By combining
Luke’s version with John’s, and Mary Magdalene with Mary of Bethany, Gregory
decided that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute who repented, anointed Jesus, and
became a follower. He used Luke’s story
about Mary’s seven devils to bolster his decision.
I
read somewhere that Gregory was seeking a female success story from Jesus’
ministry and decided this was it. In
addition to making assumptions that are unwarranted he overlooked one important
piece of evidence that negates his conclusion.
Mary Magdalene was from Magdala, in Galilee—that’s where she got her
name. Bethany is in Judea, near
Jerusalem. It’s difficult to believe the
same woman would have been identified with two such widely separated locations.
The
speculation that Jesus and Mary were married is based primarily on the fact that
most Jewish men were married. There is
no proof anywhere in the gospels that Jesus and Mary were a couple. The story goes farther. It claims that at the time of the crucifixion
Mary was pregnant. After the ascension
she was taken to southern France by Joseph of Arimathea, where she gave birth
to a child (some say female, some male) who became the founder of the
Merovingian line of kings. It’s an
interesting story, but more legend than fact.
The
other line of speculation at least has the ring of possibility. It states that Jesus chose Mary to be the
leader of the movement after his resurrection.
After the ascension the men, led by Peter, decided they did not want a
woman to be in charge, so they squeezed her out. In opposition, we have the written record of
Jesus telling Peter, “on this rock I will build my church,” and Peter’s take-charge
sermon in Acts 2. It is possible,
however, that once Mary Magdalene had been pushed aside, the written record
could have been adjusted in Peter’s favor.
Where
does all this leave us? Of course,
everyone is free to believe what he or she wants, but none of these stories are
based on fact. They are interesting, and
since we know so little about Mary, the field is open to all kinds of
speculation. Perhaps the safest route is
to accept Mary for what we know her to be, a faithful follower and disciple of
Jesus Christ, and the first person of either gender to announce the good news
of the resurrection.
No comments:
Post a Comment